Such
an exquisite relief from Amaravati entitled Adoration of the
feet of Buddha, which is now in the Madras Museum, is one
of the best aesthetically enchanting pieces. Symmetrical compositions
in art are not always peasing to the eye and hence the masterpieces
throughout the world are composed in asymmetrical form. But Adoration
of the Feet of Buddha was done in a symmetrical form and yet
it is a piece of inanimate stone which is static, it seems to be
full of movement. In the upper part of the sculpture there are visible
the feet, in the centre; there are seated two women in the left
and two women in the right of the Buddhas feet. Both the angular
and round curves of the bodies as well as the hands and legs of
the four women are rhytrhmically moving. Both the compositional
harmony and contrast in the postures and gestures are balanced in
cadence. The facial expressions of the figures reflect their inner
trace.
In
a single figure of sculpture the charm of composition would not
be so superb as in that of a group composition. An Amaravati relief
of group composition, showing several mithunas or couple, is a living
rhythm in stone. In this piece is also seen Siddhartha in his place.
Movement. Rhythmic movement and Lyrical movement, flow through the
stone. The curved line has nowhere, it seems, obtained such an enchantment
than at Amaravathi The Toilet, The Secene of Enlightenment,
Adoration of the Stupa Nanada and Sundari
etc, are some of the masterpices of Amaravati Sculpture.
The
distinctive characteristic of the Buddhist sculpture in Andhra is,
it gave greater prominence to the depiction of secular subjects
than that of religious ones.
|
|
The Buddhist
sculptors created greater number of men, women, children, trees,
beasts and birds than that of gods in their art; they sought;
delight in depicting the scenes from the daily life of common
people; the human frailties, live and hatred, amities and animosities,
unions and separations, song and dance, toilet and make up, births
and deaths had never escaped the aesthetic vision as well as the
artistic creation of the Buddhist artists of those times. The
names of those masters have remained unknown while those of their
Royal patrons have been well known. It is a pity, the name of
the old masters in the spheres of architecture, sculpture and
painting in India were hidden in obscurity ! Those old masters
had merged in the ocean of oblivion while their masterpieces have
remained immortal!
In the history
of Buddhist sculpture in Andhra, lkshwaku kings were next to the
mighty Satavahanas. After Amaravati, the important Buddhist art
centre is Nagarjunakonda are situated on the bank of river Krishna.
The lkshawakus dynasty reigned in the Krishna Valley from 250
A.D., to 340 A.D. lkshawakus were the feudal vassals of the Satavahanas
and both of them were relatives too. The lkshwaku dynasty was
founded by Siri Chanti Mul; Vijayapuri was their capttal; although
he was a follower of Brahmanism his brothers by names Himm-asirinika
and Chanki Siri were Buddhists by faith. The sculpture of Amaravati
had cast its reflections over Nagarjunakonda and thus many of
the Amaravati sculptures were repeated in them. Buddha was sculpted
there, at Sriparvata, both as an anthropomorphic figure and as
a symbolic form. Although the lkshwaku kings were the followers
or Brahmanism, their queens were the votaries of Buddha and that
was why such exquisite Buddhist sculpture
|
|
flourished
there. Some figures in Amaravati have the apparel of the Greek
type while those at Nagarjunakonda have that of seythian type.
The sculptors of Nagarjunakonda sculpted diversified subjects.
Not only religious themes but also various mundane ones had found
their expression in those sculptures. The sculptures of Nagarjunakonda
are subtler than those of Amaravati. The Nagarjunakonda sculptures
are lyrics while those of Amaravati are epics. In one of those
sculptures is illustrated a scene in which a lady rejects the
goblet of wine offered by her lover. The expression of her aversion
is only worth to be painted by the sensitive brush of a painter
rather than by the chisel of a sculptor; yet, the chisel had dome
it! What a lyrical sculpture it is!! Another Nagarjunakonda sculpture
depicts an amorous couple. In that sculpture, on the left wrist
of a lady has perched a parrot, and the lady, who is in anguish,
tries to offer something to the parrot. Her lover standing beside
her smiles in contentment. That sculpture resembles a scene described
in the Sanskrit poetic work entitled Amarasatakam.
The Buddhist
sculptors or Nagarjunaknoda had excelled those of Amaravati in
technique and treatment; they were profoundly talented in giving
aesthetic expression to their delicate emotions in their sculptures.
It seems Nagarjunakonda sculptors were more cultured, more refined
and more enlightened than those of Amaravati. That is why the
sculptures at Nagarjunakonda rare more advanced in every phase
of emotional expression and artistic execution than those at Amaravati.
In the Buddhist sculpture of Andhra, Amaravati and Nagarjunakonda
stand out as the eminent centers of artistic consummation. The
sensitive creations of these two centers are world-
|