To
live is to desire to be happy, no doubt, but relentlessly would
suffering accompany the happiness as shadow accompanies the substance.
In fact, suffering reigns supreme in life and it is very few who
appear to be happy devoid of suffering.
From
tome immemorial, all living beings, especially human beings, have
been afraid of suffering. The majority of people live in suffering
whereas the minority are happy, or apparently happy. Suffering is
a sort of the trauma of incarceration with a sensation of suffocation.
Suffering includes poverty, disease, decay and death; suffering
includes bondage, sorrow, ignorance, frustration and failure; suffering
includes the separation from the desirable and union with the undesirable.Man
is destitute of freedom. The negation of freedom is the source of
all suffering. Thus man is a prisoner in his own mind, a prisoner
in his own body, a prisoner in his own house and a prisoner in the
vast universe ! Lord Buddha, when he was prince .
So,
he ardently sought the way be which one would emancipate oneself
out of the surrounding thralldom of sorrow and suffering and attain
perennial freedom of peace and felicity. After having undergone
the fiery ordeal of intensive investigation into the mysteries of
life and the phenomena of the cosmos, with the aid of observation
as well as introspection, he was able to attain Maha Sambodhi or
the Great Enlightenment, which was deemed to be an everlasting liberation
from the bondage of sorrow and suffering. Then he aspired to share
with other fellow beings the much sought-for light of ineffable
delight which he enjoyed. Buddhas approach to freedom from
suffering had been a veritable rational one; this approach was called
Arya |
|
Satya Chatushtaya
or the Four Noble Truths consisting of the existence of suffering,
the cause of suffering, the cessation of suffering. Buddha preached
the Middle Path which avoided the two extremities of extreme self-indulgence
and extreme self-mortification. All extremities in life are disastrous
and thus they would lead the humanity to suffering.
After the
death of Buddha and with the passing of time, the Buddhists began
to lose their original interest and enthusiasm in the Dharma and
the teachings of Buddha. The former spirit of renunciation, social
service and sacrifice had commenced to diminish among the Buddhists;
the external vitualism took their place. The original path shown
by Buddha had turned very dry. Differences of opinions, conflict
in ideas and ideals as to the Buddhas doctrince (prototype),
were prevalent among the followers of Buddha. Each follower began
to interpret the Doctrine according to his own interests and inclinations.
Everywhere appeared confusion and chaos. In ordor to reorganize
the Buddhist Sangha and create permanent unity among the Sanghikas,
one of Buddhas oldest desiples. Kasyapa, convened a council
of five hundred Arthts or Buddhist sages at Rajagriha. Later,
the second Council was held at Vaisali after a century. But the
endeavours at amelioration had turen into deterioration by the
third century B.C. again a third Council o Buddhists was held
at Pataliputra, the Capital of Ashoka, that the thousand arhats
who assembled there drew up a final canon and come to the conclusion
to send Buddhist missionaries abroad for propagating the Dharma.
Mahendra, Ashokas son, founded a centre of Buddhist mission
in Ceylon whence the Dhamma emigrated to other lands, both far
and near.
|
|
But still
the flit and conflict among the Indian Buddhists had not diminished
and hence a fourth Council of Buddhists was organized in Kashmir
by Kanishka the Indo-Seythian King in the first century A. D.
it was there that the division, for the first time, took place
between the Buddhists of Ceylon and those of India, which came
to be known later as Southern and Northern Schools of Buddhism
respectivaly. The Southern School was called Hinayana (little
vehicle) which was considered to be the prototype of Lord Buddhas
teachings.After a considerable long time, the Northern Schools
assumed the name of Mahayana (great Vehicle), which owes its existence
to Nagarjuna who live din Andhra in the last part of the second
century A. D. Hinayana had remained the same unaltered, resembling
the Buddhas original Doctrine while Mahayana assumed new
forms and newer conceptions akin to Brahmanism. The Mahayanists
introduced a number of odhisattvas among whom Avalokiteswara and
manjusri were prominent. Nagarjuna had enriched the Mahayana by
his contributions of logic and metphysics to it. Nagarjunas
Madhyamika doctrine has been very famous throught the ages; he
was also known as a chemist.
Among the
Satavahana Kings, three names stand out prominent, Goutamiputra
Satakarni. Vasishtiputra Sripulamavi and Yajnasri Satakarni. Strange
it is to find that the Satavahanas belonged to Brahmanism and
yet enthusiastically encouraged the spread of Buddism it is asid,
their queens were ardent followers of Buddhas teachings.
Such religious to tolerance existed even in those days! Dhanyakataka
(Amaravati) in the present Guntur District and Srikakulam in the
present Krishana district were the two capitals of the
|